Case 2208516/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Bennett v Airnow Media Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2208516/2023
- Decision date
- 29 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Akhtar
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Bennett
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal found that Mr C Bennett’s claims for unlawful deduction from wages and breach of contract were well founded and upheld them against Airnow Media Limited. The judgment records that the unlawful deduction claim related to February 2023 and unpaid holiday pay, and that the breach of contract claim related to one month’s unpaid notice pay.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay a total of £6,762.48. That figure was broken down as £2,505.76 for unlawful deduction from wages and £4,256.72 for breach of contract. The judgment states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment says this covered February 2023 and unpaid holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £2,506 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment says this was for unpaid notice pay, one month. | Upheld | — | £4,257 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,762
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.