Case 2208548/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms N Khalifa v Soho Restaurants Limited and 1 other — 2024
- Case reference
- 2208548/2022
- Decision date
- 24 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Glennie JUDGMENT
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Ms N Khalifa
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response having been received within the rule 16 time limit, Employment Judge Glennie determined the claim on the material available under Rule 21. The judgment records that the complaint of unlawful deduction from wages against the Second Respondent, Lalaland Hospitality Limited, was well founded.
The tribunal ordered Lalaland Hospitality Limited to pay the Claimant £1,157.00 gross. The judgment directs that income tax and national insurance contributions may be deducted as appropriate, and that if deductions are made the respondent must account to HMRC and provide the Claimant with a written calculation. The claim against the First Respondent, Soho Restaurants Limited, was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Complaint against Lalaland Hospitality Limited; Rule 21 judgment made on the material available after no response was received. | Upheld | — | £1,157 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim against Soho Restaurants Limited dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,157
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.