Case 2208565/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Lindsay v NHS England — 2024
- Case reference
- 2208565/2022
- Decision date
- 28 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Isaacson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Lindsay
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs S Lindsay presented a claim form on 4 November 2022 alleging unfair dismissal, race discrimination and unauthorised deduction from wages. She later confirmed that she was dismissed on 7 November 2022, after the claim form had already been presented.
The Tribunal held that it could not accept a claim for unfair dismissal until after the claimant had been dismissed. On that basis, it found that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the unfair dismissal claim as then brought, and the claim was struck out.
The judgment records that the claimant may proceed with her race discrimination and unauthorised deduction from wages claims. No remedy was assessed in this decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out because the claimant was dismissed on 7 November 2022, after she presented the claim form on 4 November 2022, so the Tribunal held it had no jurisdiction to hear the unfair dismissal claim in its current form. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.