Case 2208588/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr F Algate v The Lymden Group Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2208588/2022
- Decision date
- 26 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr F Algate
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the London Central Employment Tribunal on 26 September 2023, before Employment Judge A M Snelson, the claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by counsel. The tribunal determined that the claimant's complaint of wrongful dismissal was well-founded.
The only remedy recorded in the judgment was damages for wrongful dismissal in the agreed sum of £11,666. The judgment does not split that sum into different heads of loss or record any separate award components.
The tribunal also noted that income tax and national insurance contributions may be payable on the award, and that if the respondent makes the appropriate deductions and accounts for them to the authorities, payment of the net sum will discharge the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant's complaint of wrongful dismissal well-founded and ordered damages in an agreed figure of £11,666. | Upheld | — | £11,666 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £11,666
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.