Case 2208594/2022 · Employment Tribunal
in person v Ms Joy Smith, HR Manager — 2023
- Case reference
- 2208594/2022
- Decision date
- 14 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
in person
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningDr W. Tang brought claims against Crabtree and Evelyn Limited, heard at London Central by CVP on 12 April 2023 before Tribunal Judge McGrade. The Tribunal held that it did not have territorial jurisdiction to consider any of the claims against the Respondent.
The Tribunal also held that the claims were submitted out of time and that it would not be just and equitable to extend time. No substantive findings on the merits of the underlying claims were made, and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The Tribunal found it had no territorial jurisdiction to consider any of the claims, and separately found the claims were presented out of time and it would not be just and equitable to extend time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The Tribunal found it had no territorial jurisdiction to consider any of the claims, and separately found the claims were presented out of time and it would not be just and equitable to extend time. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- just and equitable to extend time
- territorial jurisdiction
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.