Case 2209035/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Wright v Payment Card Solutions (UK) Ltd t/a B4B Payments — 2023
- Case reference
- 2209035/2022
- Decision date
- 17 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Stout Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Wright
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr S Wright brought claims of unfair dismissal under Part IX of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and age, sexual orientation, religion or belief, disability and race discrimination under the Equality Act 2010 against Payment Card Solutions (UK) Ltd t/a B4B Payments. A preliminary hearing on 27 April 2023 resulted in an order that the claimant pay a deposit totalling £200.
The claimant did not pay the ordered deposit. The tribunal therefore struck out all of the claimant's claims under rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. No liability findings were made on the substance of the unfair dismissal or discrimination complaints.
The judgment records that the hearing fixed for 14 July 2023 would not take place. No monetary award was made to either side in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out under rule 39(4) because the claimant failed to pay the £200 deposit ordered after the preliminary hearing on 27 April 2023. | Struck out | — | — |
| Age discrimination | Struck out under rule 39(4) because the claimant failed to pay the £200 deposit ordered after the preliminary hearing on 27 April 2023. | Struck out | Age | — |
| Sexual orientation discrimination | Struck out under rule 39(4) because the claimant failed to pay the £200 deposit ordered after the preliminary hearing on 27 April 2023. | Struck out | Sexual orientation | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | Struck out under rule 39(4) because the claimant failed to pay the £200 deposit ordered after the preliminary hearing on 27 April 2023. | Struck out | Religion or belief | — |
| Disability discrimination | Struck out under rule 39(4) because the claimant failed to pay the £200 deposit ordered after the preliminary hearing on 27 April 2023. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Race discrimination | Struck out under rule 39(4) because the claimant failed to pay the £200 deposit ordered after the preliminary hearing on 27 April 2023. | Struck out |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 39(4) Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.