Case 2209044/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Ahira (Counsel) For the v Respondent — 2025
- Case reference
- 2209044/2022
- Decision date
- 3 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Webster Appearances
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Ms Ahira (Counsel) For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, a dentist working under an Associate Agreement signed on 15 November 2021, brought an unlawful deduction from wages claim about payments for May, June and July 2022. The tribunal found that he resigned on 7 July 2022, that the contract had ended by at latest August 2022 after his bicycle accident on 1 August 2022, and that the dispute concerned the respondent’s failure to pay sums due for the final months of work and the deductions it made from those sums.
The tribunal preferred the claimant’s figures for the amounts billed in May, June and July 2022 and rejected his case that the 5 July payment was not intended to relate to May work. It held that the respondent retained the June and July monies under its interpretation of the contract, but that the proper contractual calculation for the retention figure was 40% of the average monthly charge for licence, not 40% of the gross private fees billed. On that interpretation, the maximum contractual retention was £7,073.60.
The tribunal accepted some deductions from the retention figure, including £1,040 for laboratory work and at least £975.50 for overpayments, but it was not satisfied that the respondent had properly evidenced broader negligence or remedial-work deductions. It declined to speculate about those deductions, noted the absence of a proper breakdown within the time required by clause 18.7, and rejected any attempt to justify withholding wages by equitable set-off. Applying s.13 ERA 1996 and the cited authorities, it concluded that the respondent had unlawfully deducted £29,384.40 from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of that gross sum.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Single unlawful deduction from wages claim upheld. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £29,384.40 gross; the award was not split into separate heads. | Upheld | — | £29,384 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £29,384
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
5 references- s.13 ERA 1996
- Agarwal v Cardiff University and anor
- Delaney v Staples (t/a De Montfort Recruitment)
- Murray v Strathclyde Regional Council
- Yorkshire Maintenance Company Ltd v Farr
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.