Case 2209512/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Harthan (Counsel) For the v Respondent — 2024
- Case reference
- 2209512/2023
- Decision date
- 5 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Webster
- Venue
- London Central
- Panel members
- Ms J Kilgannon, Ms J Tombs
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr P Harthan (Counsel) For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt London Central, after a hearing on 19-23 March 2024 before Employment Judge Webster sitting with Ms J Kilgannon and Ms J Tombs, the tribunal dismissed the claimant's claim for unfair dismissal. It also dismissed the disability discrimination claims, which were recorded in the judgment as discrimination arising out of disability and failure to make reasonable adjustments.
The judgment states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the decision record. The tribunal ordered the claimant to pay £1000 in costs to the respondent. The decision record was sent to the parties on 5 April 2024.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Claim pleaded as discrimination arising out of disability. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Claim for failure to make reasonable adjustments. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,000
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.