Case 2209533/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Serrafim v Mayer Construction Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2209533/2023
- Decision date
- 30 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Akhtar
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Serrafim
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr J Serrafim brought claims against Mayer Construction Limited for unlawful deduction from wages and breach of contract. The tribunal held that both claims were partially well founded and upheld them, and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £4,153.71 in total.
The award was broken down as £865.38 for unlawful deduction from wages, described as May 2023 wages and unpaid holiday pay, and £3,288.33 for breach of contract, described as unpaid notice pay for four weeks in May 2023. The tribunal also recorded that the claimant was responsible for any income tax or employee national insurance contributions due on the sums awarded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Upheld in respect of May 2023 and unpaid holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £865 |
| Breach of contract | Upheld in respect of unpaid notice pay for 4 weeks in May 2023. | Upheld | — | £3,288 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,154
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.