Case 2209535/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Andrea Cook v The Crown Prosecution Service (“CPS”) RECORD OF A PRELIMINARY HEARING — 2024
- Case reference
- 2209535/2023
- Decision date
- 20 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Havard Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Andrea Cook
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a claim form dated 26 May 2023, Miss Andrea Cook brought discrimination claims alleging race, disability, sexual orientation, and religion and belief discrimination in relation to an application for a job with the Crown Prosecution Service. The tribunal noted that the bases of the claims were not initially clear, and case management directions were made on 17 August 2023 to require further particulars so that the claims could be understood and progressed.
The claimant did not comply with those directions. A further case management hearing listed for 14 December 2023 was not attended by the claimant, and the tribunal found that she had no reasonable excuse for not attending and had failed to comply with the August directions. The tribunal then gave her another opportunity to comply and listed a preliminary hearing for 4 and 5 March 2024 to consider strike out, deposit applications, permission to amend, and further case management.
In the lead-up to the March hearing, the claimant sent emails saying she was unwell and asking for a postponement, but no satisfactory medical evidence was provided. Employment Judge Woodhead refused the adjournment application on 1 March 2024. The claimant then sent emails suggesting that she was withdrawing the claim, but the tribunal found the withdrawal position equivocal. She did not attend the hearing on 4 March 2024.
Employment Judge Havard concluded that, in light of the repeated non-attendance, the failure to comply with directions, the absence of medical evidence, and the need to apply the overriding objective fairly to both parties, the claims must be dismissed because the claimant did not attend the hearing. The tribunal did not determine the discrimination allegations on their merits and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Dismissed after the claimant failed to attend the hearing; the tribunal did not determine the merits of the allegation. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Disability discrimination | Dismissed after the claimant failed to attend the hearing; the tribunal did not determine the merits of the allegation. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Sexual orientation discrimination | Dismissed after the claimant failed to attend the hearing; the tribunal did not determine the merits of the allegation. | Dismissed | Sexual orientation | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | Dismissed after the claimant failed to attend the hearing; the tribunal did not determine the merits of the allegation. | Dismissed | Religion or belief | — |
Legal tests applied
7 references- Rule 37(a) ET Rules 2013
- Rule 37(c) ET Rules 2013
- Rule 39 ET Rules 2013
- Rule 47 ET Rules 2013
- Rule 51 ET Rules 2013
- Rule 52 ET Rules 2013
- overriding objective
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.