Case 2209554/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A J Parsons 1st v NSP Islington Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2209554/2023
- Decision date
- 16 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hindmarch Appearances
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A J Parsons 1st
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at London Central by CVP on 15 August 2023 before Employment Judge Hindmarch. The claimant, Mr A J Parsons, appeared in person. The respondent, NSP Islington Ltd, did not attend.
The tribunal found the claim for notice pay well founded and awarded £230.50. It also found the claim for unlawful deduction from wages well founded and awarded £693.84.
The tribunal further uplifted the sums awarded by £922, described as four weeks' pay, because of the respondent's failure to issue written particulars of employment under s38. The judgment records the provision as s38 Employment Act 2022, and the total sum awarded was £1,846.34.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Notice pay awarded in the sum of £230.50. | Upheld | — | £231 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unlawful deduction from wages awarded in the sum of £693.84. | Upheld | — | £694 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,846
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s38 Employment Act 2022
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.