Case 2209984/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr E Dumi v Platinum Security Guards Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2209984/2023
- Decision date
- 19 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Joffe Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr E Dumi
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr E Dumi brought a claim against Platinum Security Guards Limited for breach of contract, pleaded in the alternative as unlawful deductions from wages. The case was heard at London Central via the Cloud Video Platform on 19 October 2023 before Employment Judge Joffe. The claimant represented himself and the respondent was represented by Mr K Putman, HR consultant.
The judgment states that the claimant’s claim for breach of contract alternatively unlawful deductions from wages was not upheld and was dismissed. The written judgment records that oral reasons were given at the hearing, and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the judgment being sent to the parties.
No monetary award is recorded in the judgment, and no separate remedy figures are set out for either basis of claim.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Claim pleaded with an alternative unlawful deductions from wages basis; both were dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim pleaded in the alternative to breach of contract; both were dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.