Case 2209999/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In person v Mr S Mahi (Director) — 2023
- Case reference
- 2209999/2023
- Decision date
- 30 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Glennie Representation
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt London Central on 30 August 2023, Employment Judge Glennie heard the claim brought by Mr M Markanda against Sales Driivn (Driivn Limited), with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by Mr S Mahi, a director. The tribunal decided that the complaint of unlawful deduction from wages was well-founded.
The judgment records that the respondent was ordered to pay the claimant compensation of £10,920. No further breakdown of that figure is given in the written record, and the note states that reasons were given orally at the hearing.
No written reasons were provided in the judgment record unless requested within 14 days of the decision being sent to the parties on 30 August 2023.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £10,920 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,920
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £10,920
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.