Case 2210158/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs. A. Prempeh v Ministry of Justice — 2024
- Case reference
- 2210158/2023
- Decision date
- 30 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge J. Galbraith-Marten
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs. A. Prempeh
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a public preliminary hearing in London Central on 17 May 2024, Employment Judge J. Galbraith-Marten sitting alone determined a preliminary issue in Mrs. A. Prempeh's case against the Ministry of Justice. The tribunal found that the Claimant was a disabled person within the meaning of s.6 of the Equality Act 2010 at the material time.
The decision records that the material time agreed between the parties was 25 August 2021 and 2 March 2023. The judgment does not determine any substantive discrimination liability, dismissal issue, or remedy; it is confined to the disability-status question.
Reasons were given orally at the hearing. The written record states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested by either party within 14 days of the sending of the decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Public preliminary hearing only. The tribunal decided as a preliminary issue that the Claimant was a disabled person within the meaning of s.6 Equality Act 2010 at the material time. No substantive liability or remedy was determined in this record. | Upheld | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.6 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.