Case 2210201/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2023
- Case reference
- 2210201/2023
- Decision date
- 6 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Stout
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr K Logan brought a claim against the National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children. Employment Judge Stout sat alone at London Central by video on 6 October 2023 and heard the case with the claimant in person and Ms L Bell appearing for the respondent.
The tribunal decided that the claimant's claim for constructive unfair dismissal was presented outside the time limit in s.111 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. On that basis, the claim was dismissed and the tribunal did not determine the merits of the dismissal complaint.
The judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing, and that no written reasons would be provided unless requested under Rule 62(3) within 14 days of the sending of the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The tribunal held that the constructive unfair dismissal claim was brought outside the time limit in s.111 Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.111 ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.