Case 2210380/2023 · Employment Tribunal
in person (day 1), no appearance (day 2) For the v Mr E Walker, legal representative — 2024
- Case reference
- 2210380/2023
- Decision date
- 24 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Klimov Tribunal
- Panel members
- E Rousou, A Greenland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
in person (day 1), no appearance (day 2) For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal sat at London Central on 18 to 19 July 2024 before Employment Judge P Klimov, with Tribunal Member E Rousou and Tribunal Member A Greenland. The claimant was in person on day 1 and did not appear on day 2; the respondents were represented by Mr E Walker.
The judgment is brief and records a unanimous decision that the claimant’s claim failed and was dismissed. The extracted text does not set out separate findings on each pleaded head of claim, nor does it record any remedy award.
The decision was sent to the parties on 24 July 2024. On the face of the extracted judgment, the outcome is a complete dismissal of the claim.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The extracted judgment text does not separately list the pleaded heads of claim, but the public listing for this decision identifies race discrimination as one of the claim categories. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The extracted judgment text does not separately list the pleaded heads of claim, but the public listing for this decision identifies unlawful deduction from wages as one of the claim categories. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.