Case 2210593/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Adam Howland v Skyrocket Entertainment Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2210593/2022
- Decision date
- 28 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Nicolle
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Adam Howland
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningSkyrocket Entertainment Limited did not file an ET3. Employment Judge Nicolle therefore decided the case on the papers under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, having considered the ET1 and the claimant's correspondence.
The tribunal found that the respondent had unlawfully failed to pay Mr Adam Howland wages of £8,470.33, holiday pay of £684.93, and notice pay of £4,166.67. It ordered the respondent to pay £13,321.30 and to account to HMRC for any tax and National Insurance due on that sum. The hearing listed for 3 April 2023 was vacated and the parties were told not to attend.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £8,470 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £685 |
| Breach of contract | Paragraph 6 orders a total of £13,321.30, but the itemised sums in paragraphs 3-5 total £13,321.93; the judgment gives no explanation for the discrepancy. | Upheld | — | £4,167 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £13,321
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.