Case 2210606/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss G Balcikoniene v Sainsbury’s Supermarkets Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2210606/2022
- Decision date
- 16 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Keogh Representation
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss G Balcikoniene
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was listed for a hearing at London Central Employment Tribunal on 16 November 2023 before Employment Judge Keogh. The claimant, Miss G Balcikoniene, did not attend; the respondent, Sainsbury’s Supermarkets Ltd, was represented by Mr J Davies, Counsel.
The tribunal struck out the claimant's claim under Rule 37(1)(d) for failure actively to pursue it. No substantive determination of the underlying employment claims is recorded in the judgment text supplied.
The judgment notes that full written reasons for the decision were provided in the Case Management Order of the same date.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim(s); it records only that the claimant's claim was struck out under Rule 37(1)(d) for failure actively to pursue it. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.