Case 2210636/2022 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2023
- Case reference
- 2210636/2022
- Decision date
- 17 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Spencer
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 17 July 2023, sitting at London Central by CVP, Employment Judge Spencer struck out the Claimant's claims for breach of contract and/or non-payment of wages arising from alleged non-payment of bonus. The tribunal held that those claims had no reasonable prospect of success.
The judgment stated that the strike-out order did not affect the Claimant's disability discrimination claim, and that a separate order had been made in respect of that aspect of the case. The written record also notes that reasons had been given orally at the hearing, so written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the decision being sent to the parties.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success in relation to alleged non-payment of bonus. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success in relation to alleged non-payment of bonus. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- no reasonable prospect of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.