Case 2210670/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Liudmila Krutsko v Anzhelika Khan — 2023
- Case reference
- 2210670/2022
- Decision date
- 14 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkin Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Liudmila Krutsko
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal revoked the earlier judgment upon withdrawal issued on 8 February 2023 under rule 52. It then ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £4,058.38 for notice pay and payment in lieu of accrued but untaken holiday pay, less required tax and National Insurance deductions.
The tribunal also ordered £15,313.95 free of tax as compensation for termination of employment, and stated that this sum included a statutory redundancy payment. No order as to costs was made.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal ordered £4,058.38 for notice pay and payment in lieu of accrued but untaken holiday pay, but did not split that sum between the two heads. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Payment in lieu of accrued but untaken holiday pay was included in the combined £4,058.38 award with notice pay; the judgment did not apportion the amount. | Upheld | — | — |
| Redundancy | The tribunal ordered £15,313.95 free of tax as compensation for termination of employment, and stated that this figure included a statutory redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £15,314 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £19,372
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.