Case 2210725/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Abla v Mr C Trettey — 2023
- Case reference
- 2210725/2022
- Decision date
- 3 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge A.M.S. Green
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Abla
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing in London Central on 3 May 2023 before Employment Judge A.M.S. Green, the tribunal dealt with claims brought by Mr K Abla against Mr C Trettey for unfair dismissal, race discrimination, and religion and belief discrimination. Mr Abla was not present or represented; the respondent was represented by Mr J Byrne.
The judgment records that all three claims were struck out under rules 6(b) and 37(1)(c) for non-compliance with the Rules. No separate liability findings or remedy assessment are recorded in the written judgment, and no monetary award is stated. The note at the end records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out under rules 6(b) and 37(1)(c) for non-compliance with the Rules. | Struck out | — | — |
| Race discrimination | Struck out under rules 6(b) and 37(1)(c) for non-compliance with the Rules. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | Struck out under rules 6(b) and 37(1)(c) for non-compliance with the Rules. | Struck out | Religion or belief | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.