Case 2210747/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr H Visram v Boots Management Services Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2210747/2023
- Decision date
- 31 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anthony REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr H Visram
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal dismissed the complaint of unfair dismissal. The judgment records only the outcome and does not set out written reasons, noting that reasons were given orally at the hearing.
The Tribunal also dismissed the claimant's notice pay claim, described as a breach of contract complaint, finding it was not well-founded. The complaint concerning failure to pay a contractual redundancy payment was likewise found not well-founded and dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the complaint of unfair dismissal fails and is dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay claim: the judgment states that the complaint of breach of contract in relation to notice pay is not well-founded and is dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | The judgment describes this as a complaint that the respondent was in breach of contract by failing to pay a contractual redundancy payment; it was not well-founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.