Case 2210800/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Iushchuk v Lewag Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2210800/2023
- Decision date
- 18 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shukla
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Iushchuk
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs Iushchuk resigned by email on 18 March 2023, stating that her last day would be 18 April 2023. The parties disputed what happened on 21 March 2023. The tribunal accepted the claimant's account that she was asked to leave the premises, that there was no agreement to end the contract on that day, and that there was no discussion of her contract of employment being terminated by mutual consent.
On the objective meaning of what was said on 21 March 2023, and in the context of the resignation letter, the tribunal found that clause 14.5 of the contract applied. It held that the claimant was in effect placed on garden leave, remained an employee, was not entitled to work elsewhere, and did not work for any other employer between 21 March 2023 and 18 April 2023. The tribunal referred to Delaney v Staples [1992] 1 AC 687 for the proposition that payment in respect of garden leave constitutes wages.
The tribunal therefore found that the respondent's failure to pay salary from 1 April 2023 to 18 April 2023 inclusive was an unauthorised deduction from wages. It also found that the claimant was entitled to holiday pay accrued from 1 April 2023 to 18 April 2023 inclusive, and that failure to pay that holiday pay was also an unauthorised deduction from wages.
The judgment records that both parties were content for an order requiring payment of salary and holiday pay for 1 April 2023 to 18 April 2023 inclusive on the basis of no overtime. The reasons do not set out a single quantified award figure, only the obligation to pay those sums.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claimant was in effect on garden leave under clause 14.5 after resigning on 18 March 2023, and that the respondent's failure to pay salary from 1 April 2023 to 18 April 2023 inclusive, together with holiday pay accrued for that period, was an unauthorised deduction from wages. The written reasons ordered payment on the basis of no overtime, but did not state a single quantified currency sum. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Delaney v Staples [1992] 1 AC 687
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.