Case 2210807/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr W Nachudwa v G4S Cash Solutions (UK) Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2210807/2023
- Decision date
- 5 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Joyce Date
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr W Nachudwa
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal determined that G4S Cash Solutions (UK) Limited made an unauthorized deduction from Mr W Nachudwa's wages contrary to s. 13 Employment Rights Act 1996. It ordered the Respondent to pay the Claimant the net amount of £60.80.
The judgment also recorded that all other claims were dismissed. The extracted judgment text does not identify those other claims or give reasons for their dismissal, and written reasons were not included in the judgment text supplied.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorized deduction from wages contrary to s. 13 Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | £61 |
| Other | The judgment states that all other claims are dismissed, but the extracted judgment text does not identify those claims. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £61
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s. 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.