Case 2211291/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Bauporte Doors UK Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2211291/2022
- Decision date
- 13 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ms
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought a complaint under section 23 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 alleging unlawful deductions from wages within the meaning of section 13. The respondent did not present a response and did not appear at the hearing. The claimant attended in person, gave evidence on oath, and relied on his contract of employment, WhatsApp messages with his line manager, and an email from the payroll company setting out calculations of wages due and paid.
The tribunal found that the claimant started work on 5 September 2022, was paid for September 2022 ten days late on 10 October 2022, and was not paid anything after that date. The payroll email set out salary payments due for September, October, November and December 2022, recorded an amount already paid of £3,477.32, and identified an outstanding balance of £8,086.94. The claimant did not pursue expenses, saying they had been met from his float.
On that evidence, the tribunal was satisfied that the claimant was entitled to unpaid wages in the net sum of £8,086.94 and entered judgment accordingly. The judgment records that the respondent should account to HMRC for lawful deductions for tax and National Insurance on the amount ordered. No separate remedy beyond the wage award was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claimant's section 23 ERA 1996 complaint well-founded and ordered payment of the net sum of £8,086.94. The judgment notes that the respondent should account to HMRC for lawful deductions for tax and National Insurance on the net amount ordered. | Upheld | — | £8,087 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,087
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 23 ERA 1996
- section 13 ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.