Case 2211582/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant in person For the v Respondent — 2024
- Case reference
- 2211582/2023
- Decision date
- 21 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkin
- Venue
- London Central
- Panel members
- Mrs L Moreton, Ms S Campbell
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Claimant in person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal upheld the claimant's complaint of unfair dismissal under sections 94 and 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The tribunal made no monetary award. It held that the claimant had caused or contributed to the dismissal by blameworthy conduct and that it was just and equitable to reduce the compensatory award by 100%. It also held that it was just and equitable to reduce the basic award by 100% because of the claimant's conduct before dismissal.
The tribunal further found that any compensatory award would in any event have been reduced by 100% to reflect the likelihood that the claimant would have been fairly dismissed. The claims of automatic unfair dismissal for protected disclosure and failure to provide particulars were dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the unfair dismissal complaint well-founded but reduced both the compensatory award and the basic award by 100%, and also found any compensatory award would have been reduced by 100% to reflect the likelihood of fair dismissal in any event. | Upheld | — | £0 |
| Whistleblowing | Claim described in the judgment as automatic unfair dismissal because of a protected disclosure pursuant to section 103A ERA 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Claim for failure to provide particulars pursuant to section 4 ERA 1996. Classified as 'other' because no more specific locked taxonomy category appears to fit. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £0
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £0
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £0
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
4 references- s.94 ERA 1996
- s.98 ERA 1996
- s.103A ERA 1996
- s.4 ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.