Case 2212113/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Samson v Amazon UK Services Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2212113/2023
- Decision date
- 4 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fredericks-Bowyer Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A Samson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal considered the claimant's complaints relating to the Working Time Regulations and s45 Employment Rights Act 1996. It dismissed those complaints because they were brought out of time when it had been reasonably practicable to bring them in time, placing them beyond the Tribunal's jurisdiction.
The judgment states that only the claimant's unfair dismissal claim advances to a final hearing. No remedy, monetary award, legal test, or final determination of the unfair dismissal claim is recorded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | The Working Time Regulations complaints were dismissed as out of time and beyond the Tribunal's jurisdiction. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The complaint under s45 Employment Rights Act 1996 was dismissed as out of time and beyond the Tribunal's jurisdiction; the locked taxonomy has no more specific health and safety detriment category. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states only that the unfair dismissal claim advances to final hearing; it does not determine the outcome of that claim. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.