Case 2212114/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms C Parnell v Equans Regeneration Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2212114/2022
- Decision date
- 22 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Russell Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms C Parnell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis written record of the hearing on 22 August 2023 before Employment Judge R Russell at London Central, conducted by video, records only two preliminary applications made by the respondent, Equans Regeneration Limited. The respondent's application to strike out the claim was dismissed, and its application for a deposit order was also dismissed.
The judgment does not set out any substantive findings on the underlying employment claims, nor does it record any remedy award. It notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the tribunal's note.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The written decision records only the respondent's application to strike out the claim; that application failed and was dismissed. No substantive claim outcome is recorded in the text supplied. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The written decision records only the respondent's application for a deposit order; that application failed and was dismissed. No substantive claim outcome is recorded in the text supplied. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.