Case 2212210/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Parmar v Rowley’s Restaurant Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2212210/2022
- Decision date
- 20 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sent
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Parmar
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing took place remotely at London Central on 20 April 2023 before Tribunal Judge Plowright sitting alone. The judgment records that the respondent’s name was amended from ‘Rowley’s Restaurant’ to ‘Rowley’s Restaurant Limited’.
Mr N Parmar’s claim for unauthorised deduction of wages in relation to holiday pay succeeded. The tribunal ordered Rowley’s Restaurant Limited to pay him £3,846.25 gross for that claim.
His separate claim for breach of contract in relation to notice pay also succeeded. The tribunal ordered payment of £8,000 for that claim, making a total award of £11,846.25 gross, with the claimant responsible for tax and National Insurance on the sum.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal described this as a claim for unauthorised deduction of wages in relation to holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £3,846 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal described this as a claim for breach of contract in relation to notice pay. | Upheld | — | £8,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £11,846
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.