Case 2212244/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. John Harlinson Ramos Hurtado v Procured Property Ltd. Hearing: Final Merits Hearing — 2023
- Case reference
- 2212244/2022
- Decision date
- 6 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tinnion Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. John Harlinson Ramos Hurtado
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that three claims for unauthorised deductions from wages under s.13(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 were well founded. These related to unpaid wages for 1-14 September 2022, unpaid wages for the 4-week notice period from 15 September 2022 to 12 October 2022, and three £500 bonuses said to have been earned and due for work done in June, July and August 2022.
The Claimant’s holiday pay claim under s.13(1) ERA 1996 was dismissed as not well founded. The respondent did not attend or take part in the final merits hearing.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the Claimant a total of £4,961.28, made up of £1,153.76 for the first wages claim, £2,307.52 for the notice-period wages claim, and £1,500 for the three bonuses. Written reasons were not provided because reasons were given orally at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unlawful deduction from wages claim for non-payment of wages for 1-14 September 2022. | Upheld | — | £1,154 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unlawful deduction from wages claim for non-payment of wages for the 4-week notice period beginning 15 September 2022 and ending 12 October 2022. | Upheld | — | £2,308 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unlawful deduction from wages claim for non-payment of three £500 bonuses earned for work done in June 2022, July 2022 and August 2022. | Upheld | — | £1,500 |
| Holiday pay | Holiday pay claim under s.13(1) ERA 1996 was not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,961
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.13(1) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.