Case 2212276/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Richard Jones v Zhero Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2212276/2023
- Decision date
- 15 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gidney Appearances
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Richard Jones
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis record is a Rule 21 preliminary hearing, not a merits decision. The claimant’s claim form was sent to the respondent on 27 July 2023, the respondent did not file a response form by 24 August 2023, and no valid Rule 20 application for an extension of time to present a response had been submitted.
The tribunal therefore did not decide liability or remedy at this hearing. Instead, Employment Judge Gidney directed that a further hearing before a judge alone would be listed for 18 to 19 December 2023 to determine the respondent’s liability for the claimant’s claims, the quantum of those claims, and the claimant’s application for costs in respect of the wasted costs of the 15 September 2023 hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | No substantive claim was adjudicated in this record. The tribunal dealt only with a Rule 21 preliminary hearing after no response form had been filed and no valid extension application had been made. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.