Case 2212282/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Harvey v Transport for London — 2023
- Case reference
- 2212282/2023
- Decision date
- 23 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge E Burns Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Harvey
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant had been ordered to pay a deposit of £200 after a preliminary hearing on 27 September 2023. The order was sent to him on 3 November 2023, and he decided not to pay the deposit.
The tribunal therefore struck out the complaints under sections 47B and 103A of the Employment Rights Act 1996 under rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The remaining unfair dismissal complaint was not decided in this judgment and was listed to proceed on 13 to 15 February 2024 before an Employment Judge alone.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The judgment struck out the complaints under sections 47B and 103A of the Employment Rights Act 1996 because the claimant did not pay the £200 deposit ordered after a preliminary hearing. The remaining unfair dismissal complaint was listed to proceed later and was not adjudicated in this judgment. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 47B Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 103A Employment Rights Act 1996
- rule 39(4) Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.