Case 2212671/2023 · Employment Tribunal
in person For the v Respondent — 2024
- Case reference
- 2212671/2023
- Decision date
- 5 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Spencer
- Panel members
- Ms C Marsters, Mr S McLaughlin
Parties
1 namedClaimant
in person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat at London Central before Employment Judge F Spencer with members Ms C Marsters and Mr S McLaughlin on 30, 31 May and 3, 4 and 5 June 2024. The written record states that the judgment was given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
The tribunal held that the Claimant's claims so far as they related to the actions of Mr Butler were out of time. It also held that the Claimant's remaining claims of victimisation were not well founded. No separate remedy findings are recorded in the written decision.
The formal disposition at the end of the judgment states that all claims are dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The judgment records that the Claimant's claims so far as they relate to the actions of Mr Butler were out of time. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Victimisation | The tribunal found the Claimant's remaining claims of victimisation were not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that all claims were dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.