Case 2212759/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Vergara v The Hub Exchange Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2212759/2023
- Decision date
- 19 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Isaacson Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Vergara
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr P Vergara was employed as Chief Operating Officer under a contract that originally provided for a gross salary of £120,000 per annum and six months' notice. The Tribunal found that a written variation dated 10 June 2022 validly changed the pay structure for a period, with £96,000 to be paid in cash and £24,000 to be satisfied by B shares, but it treated that variation as temporary and said the underlying salary of £120,000 remained the foundation for later discussions.
The central dispute was whether later deferred salary was bindingly agreed to be converted into shares. The Tribunal accepted evidence that salary deferments and share conversions were discussed from time to time after June 2022, including in draft heads of terms and bridge-finance documents, but it found those documents were part of negotiations and not proof of agreement. It held that there was no clear, express agreement to vary the contract further, and that any agreement to conversion was conditional on all the claimant's terms being met, which did not happen.
The breach of contract claim was dismissed because the claimant's employment contract had not yet been terminated, so the Tribunal said it had no jurisdiction over that claim. By contrast, the unlawful deduction from wages claim succeeded: the Tribunal found the respondent had unlawfully deducted the net sum of £35,266.01 from wages and ordered that amount to be paid, with tax and NIC on the gross amount to be accounted for by the respondent.
The Tribunal also found that the respondent had not provided itemised pay statements for August to November 2022 and January 2023 to 4 July 2023, and ordered any missing pay statements to be sent to the claimant. No separate monetary award was made on that issue.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Dismissed because the claimant's contract had not yet been terminated, so the Tribunal said it did not have jurisdiction to hear the claim. The judgment stated this did not prevent a future breach of contract claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The Tribunal accepted that no binding agreement had been reached for the outstanding salary to be converted into shares and found that £35,266.01 net remained owing for the relevant period. The respondent was ordered to pay the net sum, with any tax and NIC on the gross amount payable to HMRC by the respondent. | Upheld | — | £35,266 |
| Other | The Tribunal found the respondent had failed to provide itemised pay statements for August to November 2022 and January 2023 to 4 July 2023, and ordered any missing pay statements to be sent to the claimant. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £35,266
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
4 references- section 13 ERA 1996
- section 4 ERA 1996
- section 8 ERA 1996
- section 11 ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.