Case 2212787/2023 · Employment Tribunal
in person For the v Respondent — 2024
- Case reference
- 2212787/2023
- Decision date
- 12 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Klimov Tribunal
- Venue
- London Central
- Panel members
- P Alleyne, D Shaw
Parties
1 namedClaimant
in person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe unanimous tribunal, sitting in London Central before Employment Judge P Klimov with Tribunal Members P Alleyne and D Shaw, heard Ms C Thomas's claim against the Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis on 3 and 4 September 2024. It decided that the claim was not presented within the applicable time limit.
The tribunal further found that it was not just and equitable to extend the time limit. On that basis, the claim was dismissed. The extracted judgment does not record any monetary remedy or award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment itself records only that the claim was presented out of time and that it was not just and equitable to extend time. The disability discrimination classification is taken from the case listing, as the extracted judgment text does not specify the substantive claim type. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- just and equitable to extend the time limit
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.