Case 2213039/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms I Guennoun v Churchfield Food Store Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2213039/2023
- Decision date
- 27 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Khan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms I Guennoun
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not file an ET3. Having considered the ET1 and made further enquiries with the claimant about the amount claimed, Employment Judge Khan determined the claim without a hearing under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
The tribunal held that the respondent had made an unlawful deduction from Ms I Guennoun's wages in the gross amount of £294.36. It ordered the respondent to pay that sum to the claimant and to account to HMRC for any tax and National Insurance contributions due on it. The hearing listed for 27 November 2023 was vacated.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Determined under rule 21 after the respondent failed to present an ET3. The tribunal found an unlawful deduction from wages in the gross amount of £294.36 and ordered payment of that sum, with any tax and National Insurance due to be accounted for to HMRC. | Upheld | — | £294 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £294
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.