Case 2213068/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Pawel Janowski v London Real Estate Rentals Limited Luis Felipe Tilleria Limongi PRELIMINARY HEARING — 2024
- Case reference
- 2213068/2023
- Decision date
- 28 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gidney Appearances
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Pawel Janowski
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondents failed to file a response to the claim by 13 September 2023 and did not attend the preliminary hearing on 16 February 2024. The tribunal had contacted the respondents on 14 February 2024 warning that judgment was likely if they did not respond.
After hearing the claimant, the tribunal gave Rule 21 judgment. The claimant's claim for unpaid wages, holiday and other payments succeeded against both respondents in the total sum of £1,309.00.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The Rule 21 judgment states that the claim for unpaid wages, holiday and other payments succeeds, but does not split the award by head of claim. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The Rule 21 judgment states that the claim for unpaid wages, holiday and other payments succeeds, but does not split the award by head of claim. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | The judgment refers to "other payments" but does not identify the legal basis or amount separately. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,309
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.