Case 2213166/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Pinna v Nocturne Wine Bar Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2213166/2023
- Decision date
- 11 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wisby
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Pinna
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Wisby, sitting alone, heard Mr P Pinna's claim against Nocturne Wine Bar Limited on 11 October 2023. The tribunal upheld the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages and found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages in April 2023.
The judgment records three components of the deduction: £400 gross in respect of bonus sums, £590.09 gross in respect of salary, and £150.81 gross in respect of service charge. The respondent was ordered to pay £1,140.90 gross to the claimant. No other claims or remedies are recorded in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages well-founded. The deductions were said to comprise £400 gross in respect of bonus sums, £590.09 gross in respect of salary, and £150.81 gross in respect of service charge, all in the period April 2023. | Upheld | — | £1,141 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,141
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.