Case 2213171/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Belal v Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2213171/2024
- Decision date
- 18 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Khan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Belal
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Mr A Belal's claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The stated grounds were that the claim had not been actively pursued and that the claimant had failed to comply with the tribunal's order for disclosure.
By a letter dated 24 September 2024, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not make written representations and did not request a hearing by the deadline of 8 October 2024.
Because no response was received within the time allowed, the tribunal struck out the claim. The judgment does not record any substantive findings on the underlying merits or any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The claim was struck out under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 because it had not been actively pursued and because the claimant failed to comply with the tribunal's disclosure order. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.