Case 2213229/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Ibrar v NL Consulting London Limited (In Creditors Voluntary Liquidation) — 2023
- Case reference
- 2213229/2023
- Decision date
- 18 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Flanagan
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Ibrar
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Ibrar presented claims on 8 August 2023 for unpaid wages, unfair dismissal and holiday pay against NL Consulting London Ltd (in voluntary liquidation). On 30 August 2023 the tribunal notified him that the unfair dismissal claim might be struck out because he did not appear to have sufficient service under section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, and asked him to respond by 13 September 2023.
The claimant did not respond to the tribunal’s correspondence. A hearing was listed for 18 October 2023 at London Central Employment Tribunal by CVP, but neither the claimant nor the respondent attended, and neither party responded to the tribunal’s contact. On that basis, Employment Judge Flanagan, sitting alone, found that the claim had not been complied with and had not been actively pursued.
The judgment therefore struck out the claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, relying on rule 37(1)(c) and (d). No liability findings or remedy were determined.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Part of the claim issued on 8 August 2023 for unpaid wages; the tribunal struck out the whole claim under rule 37 because the claimant had not complied with previous requests and had not actively pursued the case. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal told the claimant on 30 August 2023 that the unfair dismissal claim might be struck out because he did not appear to have sufficient service under section 108 ERA 1996, but the final order was strike out of the whole claim under rule 37. | Struck out | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Part of the claim issued on 8 August 2023 for holiday pay; no merits determination was made because the entire claim was struck out under rule 37. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37(1)(c) and (d)
- section 108 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.