Case 2213593/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Liu v The Sushi Co Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2213593/2023
- Decision date
- 29 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Norris
- Venue
- Central London
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Liu
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Central London on 23 July 2024, Employment Judge Norris sat alone via CVP. No response had been entered by the respondent within the time limit under Rule 16, and the tribunal therefore held that the claimant’s claims for unlawful deduction from wages and holiday pay succeeded under Rule 21. The tribunal ordered payment of £1,560 for wages between 17 April and 15 May 2023 and £1,812 for accrued but untaken annual leave at the date of termination.
The tribunal found that by 15 August 2023, when the proceedings commenced, the respondent had not provided the claimant with a statement of initial employment particulars or particulars of change under sections 1 and 4 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. It held that it was just and equitable to award the higher amount under section 38(3) and 38(4)(b) of the Employment Act 2002, equivalent to four weeks’ pay, and ordered payment of £2,160.
The respondent was also ordered to pay £880 for 20 hours’ preparation time because it had behaved unreasonably in the conduct of the claim. The judgment states that the total payable was £6,412 gross. It also records that the wages and holiday pay elements could be satisfied by payment of the net amount due with tax and National Insurance accounted for, while the award for written particulars and the preparation time costs were not liable to deduction.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,560 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,812 |
| Other | Award under section 38(3) and 38(4)(b) Employment Act 2002 for failure to provide a statement of initial employment particulars or particulars of change by the date proceedings commenced; not a standalone claim type in the locked taxonomy. | Upheld | — | £2,160 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,412
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.