Case 2214033/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Mason v Canzuk Global Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2214033/2023
- Decision date
- 30 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Khan Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Mason
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss C Mason brought a notice pay claim against Canzuk Global Limited. The tribunal said it would have found that the respondent breached her contract by failing to give notice of termination in circumstances where she was entitled to one week’s notice, but the claim was dismissed because it was brought out of time.
The judgment also records claims for holiday pay and expenses. Those heads were resolved by consent rather than by a contested finding, and the respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £346.50 gross. The judgment states that the payment would be made on the day of the hearing and does not break the figure down between holiday pay and expenses.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal stated it would have found that the respondent breached the claimant’s contract by failing to give notice of termination when she was entitled to one week’s notice, but the claim was dismissed because it was brought out of time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment grouped holiday pay and expenses together. By consent, the respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £346.50 gross, payable on the day, with no split recorded between the two heads. | Settled | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £347
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.