Case 2214045/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L Casey v Advanced Oncotherapy plc — 2023
- Case reference
- 2214045/2023
- Decision date
- 8 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Baty Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss L Casey
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent confirmed in its response that no part of the claim was contested. On that basis, and pursuant to Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2013, the tribunal held that the claimant's complaints of unlawful deduction from wages succeeded.
Employment Judge Baty made an award of £12,763.14 payable by the respondent to the claimant. The award was broken down as £11,105.48 gross for unpaid salary and bonus for May to August 2023 inclusive, £1,200 gross for unpaid pension contributions for March to August 2023 inclusive, and £457.66 net for unpaid private medical costs.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent filed a response confirming that no part of the claim was contested. The claimant's unlawful deduction from wages complaints succeeded under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2013, and the tribunal awarded £12,763.14. | Upheld | — | £12,763 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £12,763
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £12,763
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunal Rules 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.