Case 2214112/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Biggar v Advanced Oncotherapy plc — 2023
- Case reference
- 2214112/2023
- Decision date
- 30 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shukla
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Biggar
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that Ms Biggar’s complaint of unauthorised deductions from pay for the period May to October 2023 inclusive was well-founded. It treated the deductions as a series of deductions.
The respondent, Advanced Oncotherapy plc, was ordered to pay the claimant the gross sum of £67,500. The tribunal also recorded that no separate award was made for employee pension contributions, because the amount was ordered gross and the deductions had not been paid into the claimant’s pension in accordance with the arrangements agreed to by the claimant.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Complaint of unauthorised deductions from pay for May to October 2023 (inclusive), found well-founded as a series of deductions. The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant a gross sum of £67,500; no separate award was made for employee pension contributions because the sum was ordered gross. | Upheld | — | £67,500 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £67,500
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.