Case 2214118/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Camassa v Genuine Restaurants Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2214118/2023
- Decision date
- 3 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Keogh
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Camassa
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 30 April 2025, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out. The reasons given were that the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 20 January 2025 and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim.
The judgment was approved by Employment Judge Keogh on 29 August 2025 and sent to the parties on 3 September 2025. No substantive findings on liability or remedy were made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify individual pleaded claim heads; it records that 'the claim' was struck out because the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 20 January 2025 and had not actively pursued the case. A letter dated 30 April 2025 invited representations or a request for a hearing, but none sufficient were made. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.