Case 2214536/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. P. Rajasansir v Vi Healthy Living Ltd. Hearing: Final Merits Hearing — 2023
- Case reference
- 2214536/2023
- Decision date
- 2 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tinnion Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. P. Rajasansir
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent's application dated 26 October 2023 for an adjournment of the final merits hearing on 1 November 2023 was dismissed. Employment Judge Tinnion recorded that none of the conditions required for an adjournment under Rule 30A were satisfied.
The claimant's breach of contract claim for 8 weeks' notice pay was found well founded. The tribunal awarded £10,633.36 for 8 weeks' wages calculated at £1,329.17 net per week, together with £446.15 for 8 weeks' car allowance calculated at £55.77 net per week.
The claimant's breach of contract claim for holiday pay was also found well founded. The tribunal awarded £2,821.87 for 11.5 days of outstanding leave calculated at £245.38 net per day, making a total payment of £13,901.38 without deduction or withholding. The tribunal also held that it had no jurisdiction to consider the ET1 claim concerning the respondent's contributions to a NEST pension plan, and the claimant's costs application was dismissed. The published record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and no written reasons were requested.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Breach of contract claim for 8 weeks' notice pay. The award comprised £10,633.36 for 8 weeks' wages calculated at £1,329.17 net per week and £446.15 for 8 weeks' car allowance calculated at £55.77 net per week. | Upheld | — | £11,080 |
| Holiday pay | Breach of contract claim for holiday pay. The award was £2,821.87 for 11.5 days' outstanding leave calculated at £245.38 net per day. | Upheld | — | £2,822 |
| Other | Claim in the ET1 concerning the respondent's contributions to a NEST pension plan; the tribunal held it had no jurisdiction to consider it. | Other | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £13,901
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 30A
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.