Case 2214602/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Xamin v Mr and Ms Allem, and Mr and Mrs Kotze. Heard at London Central (by CVP) — 2024
- Case reference
- 2214602/2023
- Decision date
- 7 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shukla
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Xamin
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at London Central by CVP on 29-31 July 2024 before Employment Judge Shukla sitting alone. The claimant, Ms Xamin, brought complaints against Mr and Ms Allem and Mr and Mrs Kotze. The tribunal found that the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages, based on an alleged failure by the Kotzes to pay the minimum wage or an increment during July 2022 while the claimant was in France, was not well-founded and was dismissed.
The tribunal also dismissed the complaint of breach of contract in relation to notice pay, the holiday pay complaint, and the unfair dismissal complaint. The judgment records each of those claims as not well-founded, with no monetary award made.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Alleged failure by the Kotzes to pay the minimum wage or their increment during July 2022 while the claimant was in France. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Claim related to notice pay. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.