Case 2214964/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Lasdas v The Homes and Communities Agency T/A Homes England — 2024
- Case reference
- 2214964/2023
- Decision date
- 25 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Russell
- Panel members
- Ms J Cameron, Mr S Hearn
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Lasdas
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at London Central by video on 17, 18 and 19 July 2024 before Employment Judge R Russell sitting with Ms J Cameron and Mr S Hearn. The claimant, Mr S Lasdas, appeared in person and the respondent, The Homes and Communities Agency t/a Homes England, was represented by counsel. The tribunal said its judgment was unanimous.
The tribunal dismissed the complaint of direct race discrimination as not well-founded. It also dismissed the breach of contract complaint as not well founded. The complaint of automatic unfair dismissal was likewise found not well founded and dismissed.
The written record states that the claim was dismissed in its entirety. It also notes that the reasons for the judgment had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the note on the judgment form.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.