Case 2214971/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. Godwin Oloukun v Jones Lang LaSalle Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2214971/2023
- Decision date
- 18 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Smart
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. Godwin Oloukun
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal dismissed the holiday pay claim upon withdrawal. The wrongful dismissal claim was well founded and succeeded, but by consent no additional compensation was due because the claimant had already been paid for his notice period.
The automatic unfair dismissal claim under section 104 Employment Rights Act 1996 was dismissed. The direct discrimination claims concerning age, race and disability, and the claim for failure to make reasonable adjustments, were also dismissed. The unlawful deduction of wages claim succeeded, and the respondent was ordered to pay the claimant 632.97 pounds gross, subject to usual deductions at source.
Claims and outcomes
7 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the claim for holiday pay was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The claim succeeded, but the judgment states that no additional compensation was due because the claimant had already been paid for his notice period. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment describes this as automatic unfair dismissal in breach of section 104 Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Age discrimination | The direct discrimination claim for age failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Race discrimination | The direct discrimination claim for race failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Disability discrimination | The direct disability discrimination claim and the failure to make reasonable adjustments claim failed and were dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the unlawful deduction of wages claim was well founded and succeeded. |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £633
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
4 references- section 104 Employment Rights Act 1996
- sections 13 and 39 Equality Act 2010
- sections 20, 21 and 39 Equality Act 2010
- section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.