Case 2215119/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Roma Singhal v Imperium Global Ventures Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2215119/2023
- Decision date
- 5 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge H Clark Representation
- Venue
- London Central via Cloud Video Platform
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Roma Singhal
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 5 January 2024, Employment Judge H Clark heard the case at London Central via the Cloud Video Platform. The tribunal found that the respondent had unlawfully deducted £2,266.20 from the claimant’s wages, described in the judgment as deductions by way of salary and accrued annual leave. That claim was upheld.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had breached the claimant’s contract by failing to reimburse expenses. The claimant was awarded £80 in damages for that breach of contract claim. No other claims, legal tests, or remedy elements are recorded in the written judgment extract.
The judgment is a short oral decision record, and it does not provide written reasons beyond the conclusions recorded above. The total monetary outcome recorded from the two upheld claims is £2,346.20.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £2,266 |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £80 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,346
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.